When I see myself at the
front of that classroom eight years ago, I am wearing my favorite
skirt—mid-calf, with overlapping splashes of black and magenta and
sea-green. A long silky blouse, bare
legs and sandals. My hair at the time is
thick and glossy, dark brown with red and gold highlights. I’m smiling.
I throw out questions, elicit the students’ answers, cajole them when
they’re reticent. I am so used to this
that I come to class with only a vague idea of where we’re at and where we’re
going.
Students have always
liked me. I’m older than they are but look their age. And, like all young people, I’m more
beautiful than I realize--which goes a long way with the boys, even the ones in
the back of the room, scowling under their baseball caps. I win them over, I get them talking. In those days, I’d memorize their names on
the first day—all 30 of them. I’d let my
intellect sparkle, but I also knew when to play it down, to let them know I was
one of them.
There was, however, one
student in this particular lit class who disturbed me. He looked about 50, short and stocky with
wild wisps of white hair. He had massive
shoulders and a rolling gait that reminded me of a sailor. Most notably, he was missing his right
forearm. He’d fling the stump around
when he talked, oblivious to its effect.
I didn’t know, at first, if I liked him--but I expected to, as sooner or
later I liked, even loved, all my students.
But it turned out that
he didn’t like me—or the course, or the novel I’d assigned: A Fine Balance,
by Rohinton Mistry. Set in India in the
1970s, it depicts a long cascade of events that plunges a boy and his uncle
deeper and deeper into poverty, always teetering on the edge of annihilation.
It’s a risky selection, set in an unfamiliar place and time. Worse, it’s over 300 pages long. But the story is sprawling, full of action
and dialogue—surely every student could find some version of him or herself in
its pages.
But no. Charlie would interrupt: Why are we reading this? What does this have to do with me? You’re not teaching us anything. The younger boys seated around him would
titter, sneaking glances at me under their eyelashes. I’d try to appease him—I hear you; you’re
not a fan. Or I’d try teasing him
out of his bad mood: Oh, c’mon,
Charlie, this is a great book! Yeah,
it’s set in India but can’t you relate to the characters, to what they’re going
through? After a while I just tried
to ignore him, turn my attention quickly to another student.
His papers were wildly
disorganized, a few ideas strung together with no recognizable theme. I was
giving him C’s; I figured he was mad.
After
15 weeks, the class staggered to its end, as all classes do. On the last day I handed out the standard,
college-supplied course evaluations. I waited
outside in the hall while they filled them out.
When I came back in the students were talking among themselves. I caught what must’ve been the tail end of an
argument: “Well, at least she smiles—some teachers don’t even do that.” I felt
a prickle of anxiety, but also an obsequious gratitude for the student sticking
up for me, a “good student,” one of the few who understood what I was getting
at.
A
few weeks later I received the results of the evaluation, compiled by
administrators. I pulled them out of the
envelope with some trepidation, realizing this course had not been my
best. But I was stunned by the comments
appended to the numerical data:
This class was a waste of time
The teacher was terrible, totally
disorganized.
The novel we read was boring. Way too long.
She was the worst teacher I ever had.
Later,
I would know how to brace myself for the one or two students in every classroom
who would simply despise you and everything you did. But this was more like eight students, with
an additional smattering of those who were lukewarm. A few students defended me vigorously, but of
course it’s the negatives that looped around in my brain, that set me reeling.
In
the semesters that followed, I found myself snapping at a group of snarky girls from a wealthy white suburb, furious when students came to class without a first draft for critiques, and overwhelmed with the endless stacks of papers to grade. It became clear that our new dean was looking to prune out adjuncts he perceived as "dead wood"--more accurately, those he saw as threatening to his authority. On the last day of spring semester
2012, I received a letter: We will not be renewing your appointment for the
fall … . Three other recipients,
all women over 40 with decades of teaching experience, filed a lawsuit. But at
the last minute I couldn’t sign on to a process that I knew would drag on,
possibly for years—a process in which my vulnerabilities, my failures, would be
exposed and exploited. Although I felt
furious and misused, I was also, deep-down, ashamed.
Looking
back at that long-ago class, I see myself as naive. I thought I could get by on my love for my
students, for literature, for the give and take of truth-seeking, for the
precision and magic of language. But
when another school hired me (for which I was very, very grateful), I became a
workhorse, cranking out the same comp class over and over. I stopped over over-hauling
my classes every semester. I re-used the
same unglamorous but serviceable textbook, the same sequence of
assignments. I did it the way teachers
are taught to teach—through lesson plans and “research-based pedagogy” and
“scaffolding” and “classroom management software,” all the educational
buzzwords of the day.
I’d be lying to
say I was unsuccessful. In those 6
years, I loved my students fiercely. They were the opposite of
entitled--humble, almost apologetic--coping with poverty, homelessness, mental
illness, hunger, and trauma. Many
thrived on structure, on predictability, on things being minutely spelled out
and repeated again and again, both in class and online. I did everything I could to accommodate their
needs. But I carried the stress of knowing it was not enough.
I’d been teaching the
same courses for nearly 20 years. I was nearly
sick with exhaustion. When it came time
to order textbooks for the fall semester, I stared at the screen.
No comments:
Post a Comment